FICHE FINANCIERE SIMPLIFIEE


Domaine(s) politique(s): ADMINISTRATION

Activité(s): PERSONAL POLICY AND MANAGEMENT

 


Dénomination de l’action: Multi-annual action plan on well-being at work (2006-2009)

1.           LIGNE(S) BUDGÉTAIRE(S) + INTITULÉ(S)

26.015004

XX.010211 (training – enveloppes globales de toutes les DGs)

26.010211.00.04 (études et consultations de la DG ADMIN)

XX.010301 (infrastructures)

Budgets des offices, pour la partie du budget de fonctionnement consacrée aux actions de ce type

 

2.           DONNÉES CHIFFRÉES GLOBALES

2.1         Enveloppe totale de l’action:

94,995 Mio€ en CE

 

2.2         Période d’application:

            2006 - 2009

 

2.3         Estimation globale pluriannuelle des dépenses:

a) Echéancier crédits d'engagement/crédits de paiement (intervention financière) (cf. point 6.1.1) – voir fiches respectives annexées

                                                                                                    Mio€ (à la 3ème décimale)

 

 

Année 2006

 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

 

 

 

Total

Crédits d'engagement

18,510

23,143

25,907

27,435

 

94,995

Crédits de paiement

18,510

23,143

25,907

27,435

 

94,995

 


b) Assistance technique et administrative (ATA) et dépenses d’appui (DDA) (cf. point 6.1.2)

CE

 

 

 

 

 

 

CP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total a+b

 

 

 

 

 

 

CE non-dissociés

18,510

23,143

25,907

27,435

 

94,995

CP non-dissociés

18,510

23,143

25,907

27,435

 

94,995

 

2.4         Compatibilité avec la programmation financière et les perspectives financières

þ Proposition compatible avec la programmation financière existante

¨      Cette proposition nécessite une reprogrammation de la rubrique concernée des perspectives financières,

¨      Y compris, le cas échéant, un recours aux dispositions de l’accord interinstitutionnel.

¨ Type de dépense : il s'agit de définir la classification économique des dépenses en distinguant les dépenses courantes des dépenses en capital. Cette classification permet une meilleure articulation entre la comptabilité budgétaire et la comptabilité générale

þ      Dépenses courantes : elles sont liées aux charges de l'exercice.

¨      Dépenses en capital: elles sont liés aux postes du bilan. Quel type d'activité, ces dépenses sont-elles destinées à financer?

3.           CARACTÉRISTIQUES BUDGÉTAIRES

 

Nature de la dépense

Nouvelle

Participation AELE

Participation pays candidats

Rubrique PF

DO/DNO

CD/CND

OUI/NON

OUI/NON

OUI/NON

N° 5

4.           BASE LÉGALE

Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities, notably article 1e

5.           DESCRIPTION ET JUSTIFICATION

5.1         Nécessité d'une intervention communautaire

5.1.1 Objectifs poursuivis

Amélioration de la santé, de la réconciliation entre la vie au travail et la vie privée et de l’environnement du travail du personnel, ainsi que les provisions pour leurs familles telle que prévue dans le plan d’action sur le bien-être au travail.

Amélioration de la provision des infrastructures sociales.

 

5.1.2 Dispositions prises relevant de l’évaluation ex ante

Ex ante evaluation of a future well-being policy of the European Commission, launched September 2004, finalized June 2005, conducted by external consultants (Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services LLP, Britain), final report available under: http://www.cc.cec/dgintranet/admin/policy/planning/docs_evaluation/projects_2004/future_well_being_policy_en.zip

Over a third of Commission staff does not feel to have achieved a reasonable work-life balance. Whilst there is scope for individual staff to take action to improve their work-life-balance, Commission working practices and the management culture also need to be improved to tackle this issue. In general, stress levels in the Commission seem to be higher than in comparable organisations. Other issues highlighted by the ex ante evaluation include the lack of sufficient day care facilities and the lack of social activities to help promote integration of staff and their families.

The ex ante evaluation contains a list of 31 key well-being actions which have been, to the extent possible, included in the multi-annual action plan on well-being at work.

 

 

5.1.3 Dispositions prises à la suite de l’évaluation ex post

 

New policy to be implemented, evaluations foreseen at mid-term and the end of the current Commission.  No new expenditure is planned, as the policy brings together existing actions in one framework.


 

5.2         Actions envisagées et modalités de l'intervention budgétaire

General objective: see 5.1.1

Principal objectives:

 

   An improvement of health and safety at work in all premises of the Commission

          Concrete measures:         Reinforcement of health and safety at the workplace

Reinforcement of preventive medicine and necessary administrative adjustments

                                                Development of appropriate sports and leisure facilities

   Spouse and family support

          Concrete measures:         Support actions for spouses/partners

                                                Development of new child-care facilities

                                                A new policy for dependants

   A better reconciliation between professional and private life

          Concrete measures:         Commission-wide implementation of flexi-time

                                                Commission-wide implementation of teleworking facilities

   A human resources policy oriented towards an individualized assistance to the staff member and an improvement of his/her working environment

          Concrete measures:         Implementation of a coherent policy on absence on medical reasons and invalidity

                                                Prevention of psychological and sexual harassment

 

Affected population: all Commission staff and (for certain actions) their families

 

Impact assessment: The improvement of working conditions will be continuously evaluated. Short-, medium- and long-term indicators have been defined to evaluate the impact of the new policy on well-being (NB: Measuring the extent of staff well-being is not straightforward – although various ‘soft’ indicators can be used based on survey work, there are few ‘hard’ indicators of a quantifiable nature and they are essentially measures of negativity). Examples for possible performance indicators: percentage of staff with high or very high work-related stress, percentage of staff achieving satisfying work-life-balance, proportion of staff using flexi-time, satisfaction with services, etc.).

 

Budget: general budget, details see point 1

 

5.3         Modalités de mise en œuvre

Gestion directe par la Commission avec du personnel statutaire ou externe. Le cas échéant, le recours à l’externalisation n’est pas à exclure.


PROGRAMMATION PLURIANNUELLE DES COUTS OIB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Coûts

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

Crèches

16.672.429

19.289.252

24.945.121

28.982.653

29.530.818

34.637.148

35.298.403

Garderies post-scolaires (GPS)

3.576.053

3.912.933

4.778.163

5.409.670

5.511.785

6.157.953

6.275.033

Garderies aérées (GA)

1.017.864

1.038.221

1.058.985

378.635

1.705.798

1.739.914

1.774.712

TOTAL DES COUTS DU CPE

21.266.346

24.240.406

30.782.269

34.770.958

36.748.401

42.535.015

43.348.148

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RESTAURANTS

982.000

1.123.600

1.146.072

1.168.994

1.192.373

1.216.221

1.240.545

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL DES COUTS

22.248.346

25.364.006

31.928.341

35.939.952

37.940.774

43.751.236

44.588.693

Centre de la Petite Enfance (CPE): à financer par les crédits C1 du budget de la Commission (*)

14.461.115

16.483.476

20.931.943

23.644.252

24.988.913

28.923.810

29.476.741

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(*) - Clefs de répartition des recettes couvrant les coûts du CPE: 20% (parents) - 80% (institutions) dont 85% proviennent de la Commission et 15% des autres institutions.


 

 

PROGRAMMATION BUDGETAIRE PLURIANNUELLE OIL

DONNEES DE REFERENCE : Comité de Direction - décembre 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

Immeuble/objet

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

 CPE 1,2

283410

291912

300670

309690

318980

 CPE 3

184667

190207

195913

201790

207844

 CPE 3 Extension 2596 m² brut

 

 

64008

197786

203720

 Foyer HEINE

32576

33554

34560

35597

36665

 CPE 4 2100 m² brut

232500

319300

328879

338745

348908

 CPE-MAMER

 

 

 

 

295327

 CPE-MAMER

 aménagements  spécifiques

 

 

 

 

39150

 Total

733153

834973

924030

1083609

1450594

 

 


MODE DE CALCUL :

 

 

 

2005

(Mio EUR)

2006

(Mio EUR)

2007

(Mio EUR)

2008

(Mio EUR)

2009

(Mio EUR)

Social activities[1]

0,040

0,170

0,230[2]

0,170

0,170

Social infrastructure - OIB

15,443

17,607

22,078

 

24,813

 

26,181

 

Social infrastructure - OIL

  0,513

 

  0,733

 

  0,835

 

  0,924

 

  1,084

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

15,996

18,510

23,143

25,907

27,435

 



[1] NB: These figures only comprise the costs directly linked to the concrete actions in the framework of the action plan on well-being. It goes without saying that the costs for already existing measures in the framework of social policy (e.g. family aid, help for disabled, reimbursement of exceptional school fees) and their increase are not comprised in these figures.

[2] 10 job hunting courses for spouses à 2500€ = 25.000€; 10 language courses for spouses à 5000€ = 50.000€;

Brussels visits for spouses 45.000€; social events 50.000€; costs for possible study in the framework of long-term care (non-recurring amount) 60.000€; other complementary actions may be envisaged.

A Document
A&D-L : Action & Défense - Luxembourg
Presents this document for information purposes.